|
Today's Tip: Fact-Checking Forwards Before You Pass Them On One in twelve people forward false stories they see online… and adults over sixty-five do it more than any other age group. Not because they mean to. Because it takes twelve seconds to hit send and twelve minutes to verify. Let me explain… My neighbor Yolanda drives a school bus part-time in Fresno. Last Tuesday morning she got a text from her cousin in Bakersfield — a screenshot of a Facebook post claiming a major grocery chain was recalling every bag of frozen broccoli sold in the last six months. It named a brand. It named a date. It looked serious. Yolanda almost forwarded it to her daughter, who has two small kids and buys frozen vegetables every week. Instead she opened Grok on her phone and pasted in the text of the post. Twenty seconds later she had her answer… the recall was real, but it was from four years ago, and the affected product was a different brand and lot number entirely. Someone had reshared an old story with a scary headline, and it was spreading again. She didn't forward it. She sent her cousin the correction. And she saved her daughter a panicked trip to the freezer. Here's the thing… this happens to everyone in your generation more than in any other. Not because you're careless. Because you're generous. You see something that could hurt the people you love, and your instinct is to warn them. That instinct is good. But it's the exact instinct that hoaxers and lazy content mills count on. Grok happens to be the best tool for this one job — better than Claude, better than Gemini — because it pulls information from the live web the moment you ask. Here's the prompt that does it… |

Your Power Bill Is Funding the AI Boom
The bulk order that keeps the lights on across 13 states just jumped from $2.2 billion to $14.7 billion — nearly 7x in one year — because data centers are draining the grid. There's one energy source that runs 24/7 with no fuel, and Washington just preserved its tax credits through 2033 while terminating everyone else's. Google signed for 15 years. Bill Gates invested $100 million. One company has spent sixty years building it.
| ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Try it once and you'll notice something surprising. About half the alarming forwards making the rounds right now are recycled from years ago — different date, different administration, different situation entirely. But the emotional punch still lands, so people share. The other half tend to fall into three buckets… an actual event stripped of context, an actual event with one crucial detail flipped, or a completely made-up story dressed up to look like local news.
I know what you're thinking… "Isn't Grok owned by Elon Musk? Can I trust its answers on anything political or controversial?" Fair question. Use it for the fact of whether an event happened, not for opinions about what it means. If Grok tells you a story is being covered by the Associated Press, Reuters, and your local ABC affiliate, that's something you can verify by clicking through. If Grok tries to editorialize, ignore that part. You're using it as a search engine with a memory, not as a judge.
Save this prompt somewhere you can find it. Notes app, sticky note by the computer, wherever works. The next time something scary lands in your inbox or your texts, run it through before you hit forward. You will save yourself embarrassment. You will save your friends worry. And you might slow down one small stream of the flood. |
| ★ ★ ★ |
|
| ★ ★ ★ |
|
★ Quick Wins
|
|
Skill Builder: The Show-Me-Three Prompt Here's something that will change how you use AI overnight. Whenever you ask AI to do anything — write an email, plan a meal, summarize a document, suggest a doctor's question — don't ask for one version. Ask for three. Most people take the first answer AI gives them. That first answer is almost never the best one… it's the most predictable one. AI defaults to safe, middle-of-the-road output. But when you tell it to give you three different versions with three different angles, something clicks. It stops guessing and starts offering. You get to be the judge. Which is exactly the position you should be in. AI is fantastic at generating possibilities. You know your situation, your voice, your family, your history. Pick the version that feels right, or take one sentence from version one and two sentences from version two, and make your own. The trick is telling AI how to make the three versions different. If you just ask for three, you often get three near-identical answers. So spell out the variation — one polite, one direct, one funny, or one for a formal audience, one for a friend, one for a stranger. That's where the useful difference comes from.
Use this today. Whatever you were going to ask AI for — an email to your insurance company, a note to your grandchildren, a recipe substitution — ask for three, spelled-out different, with a recommendation at the end. You will pick the right one faster. And the one you pick will sound more like you. |

A better way to pick AI winners
Nvidia?
Palantir?
CrowdStrike?
The next AI stock nobody's heard of yet?
Investors are spending an enormous amount of time trying to guess which AI company will be the biggest winner.
I think there's an easier way to play it.
Instead of betting on one AI stock...
I found a single $38 fund that gives you exposure to dozens of them.
And here's the part that really caught my attention:
It pays income every Thursday.
At its current distribution rate, that could mean as much as $1,051 a month.
From a portfolio built around AI stocks that generally pay little or no dividend themselves.
I put together a short briefing explaining exactly how this works...
Including what the fund owns, where the weekly income comes from, and how investors can potentially collect their first Thursday payment.
| ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
